http://atheismisgood.disqus.com/enFri, 25 Dec 2009 02:24:28 -0000http://atheismisgood.com/2007/10/08/11/the-tautology-of-false-doctrine/#comment-27240735<p>The "false doctrine" is indeed a tautology if you want to analyze the matter like that. My opinion on the matter is rather simple and honest and it goes like this: each doctrine wants supremacy over the other and that is why their doctrine is true and ALL the others are false. Religious doctrines are like little children: my religion is better and bigger than yours:)) Hope you agree with me:)) <br>_________________________________________<br><a href="http://www.ucg.org/bsc/08/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.ucg.org/bsc/08/">Christianity Religion</a></p>PriestSevinaFri, 25 Dec 2009 02:24:28 -0000http://atheismisgood.com/2007/10/08/11/the-tautology-of-false-doctrine/#comment-6115563<p>Nothing happened to me - I happened :) I hear you have acquired my e-Mail from Lucy. I look forward to hearing from you soon.</p>chalkersMon, 15 Oct 2007 08:57:09 -0000http://atheismisgood.com/2007/10/08/11/the-tautology-of-false-doctrine/#comment-6115562<p>What the heck has happened to you? E-mail me</p>Jonathan GillSat, 13 Oct 2007 08:11:57 -0000http://atheismisgood.com/2007/10/08/11/the-tautology-of-false-doctrine/#comment-6115561<p>The statement is not "there is no truth".</p><p>It's "if there is no proof of an entity how can a doctrine be true (i.e. an accurate model of how things work) that comes from said entity? It cannot." It can be as only true as the being alleged to decree that doctrine. A theist's perquisite is to believe or have faith therefore it cannot be cut and dry and they cannot say what doctrine is false and true since it's only a belief. Belief operates outside of the parameters of true and false.</p><p>The only logical place to put oneself is outside of faith, belief, doctrine and religion and find the ever increasing reality based truth ourselves.</p><p>P.S. To say "There is no truth" is like a liar saying "I always lie" ;)</p>chalkersFri, 12 Oct 2007 19:30:50 -0000http://atheismisgood.com/2007/10/08/11/the-tautology-of-false-doctrine/#comment-6115560<p>Wait a minute...<br>The statement 'there is no truth' is inherently flawed.<br>If its true that there no truth, then the statement above is not true (it cannot be proven to be true) and therefore there is truth...<br>I don't think we have won the argument yet...<br>big hug<br>s</p>SharonFri, 12 Oct 2007 18:34:58 -0000http://atheismisgood.com/2007/10/08/11/the-tautology-of-false-doctrine/#comment-6115559<p>Wouldn't have made a lengthy post :)</p>chalkersMon, 08 Oct 2007 13:51:44 -0000http://atheismisgood.com/2007/10/08/11/the-tautology-of-false-doctrine/#comment-6115558<p>could be easily said as "all knowledge is flawed because all knowledge is man made, and man is flawed"</p><p>Took a lot of LSD to figure that out, glad you finally did too.</p>BrydenMon, 08 Oct 2007 13:46:37 -0000