could be easily said as "all knowledge is flawed because all knowledge is man made, and man is flawed"
Took a lot of LSD to figure that out, glad you finally did too.
chalkers
· 2 years ago
Wouldn't have made a lengthy post :)
Sharon
· 2 years ago
Wait a minute... The statement 'there is no truth' is inherently flawed. If its true that there no truth, then the statement above is not true (it cannot be proven to be true) and therefore there is truth... I don't think we have won the argument yet... big hug s
chalkers
· 2 years ago
The statement is not "there is no truth".
It's "if there is no proof of an entity how can a doctrine be true (i.e. an accurate model of how things work) that comes from said entity? It cannot." It can be as only true as the being alleged to decree that doctrine. A theist's perquisite is to believe or have faith therefore it cannot be cut and dry and they cannot say what doctrine is false and true since it's only a belief. Belief operates outside of the parameters of true and false.
The only logical place to put oneself is outside of faith, belief, doctrine and religion and find the ever increasing reality based truth ourselves.
P.S. To say "There is no truth" is like a liar saying "I always lie" ;)
Jonathan Gill
· 2 years ago
What the heck has happened to you? E-mail me
chalkers
· 2 years ago
Nothing happened to me - I happened :) I hear you have acquired my e-Mail from Lucy. I look forward to hearing from you soon.
PriestSevina
· 2 days ago
The "false doctrine" is indeed a tautology if you want to analyze the matter like that. My opinion on the matter is rather simple and honest and it goes like this: each doctrine wants supremacy over the other and that is why their doctrine is true and ALL the others are false. Religious doctrines are like little children: my religion is better and bigger than yours:)) Hope you agree with me:)) _________________________________________ Christianity Religion
All Comments
Took a lot of LSD to figure that out, glad you finally did too.
The statement 'there is no truth' is inherently flawed.
If its true that there no truth, then the statement above is not true (it cannot be proven to be true) and therefore there is truth...
I don't think we have won the argument yet...
big hug
s
It's "if there is no proof of an entity how can a doctrine be true (i.e. an accurate model of how things work) that comes from said entity? It cannot." It can be as only true as the being alleged to decree that doctrine. A theist's perquisite is to believe or have faith therefore it cannot be cut and dry and they cannot say what doctrine is false and true since it's only a belief. Belief operates outside of the parameters of true and false.
The only logical place to put oneself is outside of faith, belief, doctrine and religion and find the ever increasing reality based truth ourselves.
P.S. To say "There is no truth" is like a liar saying "I always lie" ;)
_________________________________________
Christianity Religion